Questions, answered plainly.

No. Subtext is a research project. There is nothing to sign up for, buy or run.

No. It is a research direction about private context for agents. The chat-app shape is deliberately absent.

There is no product and therefore no prompt pipeline. We do not claim no-logs for something that does not exist.

The memory, strategy, constraints and authority an agent uses — the thinking behind a transaction rather than the transaction itself.

It is being built for agents and real-world assets, which makes context privacy concrete rather than decorative. We build on it; we are not affiliated with it.

No. Settlement staying public and auditable is part of the thesis. The research target is the context, not the ledger.

The token is not launched and its role is not defined. It represents no equity, revenue, yield or claim on anything.

That is deliberately unanswered. Inventing a utility to fill a page would be a claim we cannot support.

No. We state that plainly and will say so until an audit exists.

A signed hardware report proving computation ran where it claims. We explain it because our research references it; we claim none.

A trusted execution environment — hardware that hides computation from its operator. Same answer: referenced, not claimed.

Read the thesis and the research notes, check the status page, and poke holes. Reviewers are the product of this phase.

Yes — the open questions in each note are real. Disagree with the notes; that is useful.

Stages with evidence gates, no dates. A stage moves only when its evidence exists.

No. Not affiliated, not endorsed. The chain name describes where we build, nothing more.